When planning your SOC 2® compliance journey, one of the most important structural decisions is choosing between a point-in-time audit and a period audit. This choice affects how your controls are evaluated, how much evidence you need to gather, and ultimately, how much credibility your report will carry with customers and prospects.
In this article, we’ll break down the differences between point-in-time and period auditing, using simple language and practical examples.
What is a Point-in-Time Audit?
A point-in-time audit assesses whether your internal controls are designed appropriately at a specific moment. This model is used in SOC 2 Type I reports.
Characteristics:
Evaluates control design, not operation
Single date or snapshot of your systems and processes
Easier to prepare, faster to complete
Useful for early-stage companies seeking quick assurance
Think of it as a “photo” of your compliance posture on one specific day.
What is a Period Audit?
A period audit evaluates whether your controls are not only in place, but also functioning effectively over time. This is the foundation of a SOC 2 Type II report.
Characteristics:
Tests the operational effectiveness of your controls
Covers a continuous timeframe (e.g., 3, 6, or 12 months)
Requires real evidence of consistent execution
More credible and often required by enterprise clients
This model is more like a “movie” showing how your systems behave across time.
Quick Comparison Table
Feature | Point-in-Time Audit | Period Audit |
---|---|---|
Used in | SOC 2 Type I | SOC 2 Type II |
Focus | Control design | Control operation over time |
Timeline | Single day | 3–12 months typically |
Evidence needed | Policies, configs | Logs, monitoring, tickets |
Client perception | Moderate credibility | High credibility |
Which One Should You Choose?
If you’re early in your compliance journey, a point-in-time audit may help you get to market faster and show initial progress. But if you’re selling to larger organizations or processing sensitive data, a period audit (SOC® 2 Type II) will likely be necessary.
Many companies start with point-in-time and then follow with period-based audits as they mature.
Understanding the difference between point-in-time and period auditing helps set realistic expectations and avoid surprises. It’s not just about passing an audit—it’s about aligning your internal practices with long-term credibility.