How Clients View Type I vs Type II SOC 2 Reports

Similar posts

How Clients View Type I vs Type II SOC 2 Reports

Most likely, while approaching clients, you will get a question, “Are you SOC 2 compliant?”

When dealing with corporate clients or those in regulated industries, such as fintech, healthcare, and international software as a service (SaaS), the type of SOC2® report your company has is a key signal of trust.

A Type I SOC 2® report demonstrates that your security controls are designed properly at a specific moment in time. It’s efficient and straightforward, often appealing to early-stage clients or those pushing for quick trust proof .

However, world-class procurement teams and vendor risk reviewers expect more: “Do those controls work consistently?” A Type II report, covering 3–12 months of tested control effectiveness, positions you as a mature and reliable partner, one with real staying power in protecting customer data

1. Type I: The Initial Trust Marker

  • 🔍 Snapshot audit: Shows you’ve implemented a control framework useful in early conversations. Clients often accept this to kick off deals when speed is vital . Learn more in our guide to point-in-time vs period auditing.

  • Limited assurance: It doesn’t confirm that controls were actually working, raising valid buyer questions like, “How do we know it’s not just a plan on paper?”.

  • Reddit wisdom:

    “SOC 2 Type I is for readiness, with no controls testing. Type II is for effectiveness…” 

Sales implication:
Type I is a recognized trust gate, but rarely sufficient for enterprise deals. It signals commitment, but buyers will often ask: “When do we get the deeper proof?”

2. Type II: The Operational Proof Buyers Want

  • Controls-in-action: Audit covers real-world operation of controls over time, typically 3 to 12 months, providing robust assurance that your systems aren’t just well-built, but well-used .

  • Enterprise expectation: Many procurement teams won’t proceed without it. Type II is becoming non-negotiable in regulated sectors .

  • Tradeoffs in play: It’s more time-consuming and costly, but clients see it as a sign of maturity and consistency .

Sales implication:
Type II is the level-up trust accelerator frequently mentioned in RFPs and vendor reviews by buyers looking for long-term security and reliability.

If you’re unclear on what auditors look for across Type I and Type II, see our post on evidence requirements for both types.

3. How Buyers Compare Type I vs Type II

Attribute SOC 2 Type I SOC 2 Type II
Client Confidence Initial assurance, but short-lived Deep trust through consistent control testing
Delivery Speed & Cost Faster, less expensive Slower, more expensive—but higher value
Deal Context Good for initial pipelines or startups Crucial for enterprise or regulated deals
Sales Messaging “We’ve built this” “We’re using this every day”

4. Messaging Strategy: From Snapshot to Sustained Trust

  • Start with Type I if needed: Especially if investors or early clients demand quick proof.

  • Always share the roadmap: Be transparent “We’re launching Type II in Q3” adds credibility.

  • Consider skipping Type I: If targeting enterprise from day one, straight-to-Type II shows you already level up, often more efficient in the long run.

  • Still deciding between them? Read our comparison of SOC 2 Type I vs Type II for a full breakdown.

5. Handling Objections When You Only Have Type I

Even without Type II, you can build confidence by:

  • Presenting a timeline toward Type II (e.g., a six-month window).

  • Pledging contractual compliance goals (like Type II deliverables by X date).

  • Offering interim transparency private sessions to share controls evidence and maturity checkpoints.

This proactive communication often satisfies cautious buyers and keeps deals alive.

Final Takeaways

  • Type I = “We have a control framework” but might not satisfy enterprise-grade assurance.

  • Type II = “We operate it consistently ” and this builds deep trust with buyers.

  • Smart sales teams plan the Type I → Type II progression early, aligning compliance with the revenue roadmap.

  • Going directly to Type II can shorten pipelines and signal sophistication but only if you’re ready for it.


Related Insights from the Humadroid Series

By aligning your SOC 2® roadmap with buyer expectations, you position your organization not just as secure, but as a partner worthy of long-term trust. Let me know if you’d like to include customer case quotes or vendor review snapshots next!

Live Demo

Join us on a personalized onboarding session! As we launch our service, we’re eager to connect directly with each of our clients. Booking a session with us means we can better understand your unique needs and tailor our solution to fit you perfectly. Let’s start this journey together—your insights are invaluable as we grow and refine our offerings. Click here to schedule a time that works best for you!